Most organizations still run access reviews through spreadsheets, exported lists, or disconnected approval workflows. Reviewers are asked to approve access without enough context to understand what an entitlement does, what risk it carries, or whether it creates a conflict.
As a result, access reviews become difficult to defend. Scope is incomplete, decisions are inconsistent, and audit evidence has to be reconstructed after the fact. In fragmented IGA environments, roles and entitlements often live in separate systems, so recertification is never truly complete.